Marbury v. Madison: Establishing Judicial Review
The 1803 Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, is a cornerstone of American jurisprudence. It established the principle of judicial review, meaning the Supreme Court can declare a law unconstitutional. This case dramatically shifted the balance of power within the U.S. government, giving the judiciary a vital role in interpreting the Constitution.
The Context Leading to the Case
The drama began in the final days of John Adams’ presidency in 1801. As a Federalist, Adams was attempting to solidify his party’s influence before Thomas Jefferson, a Democratic-Republican, took office. Adams appointed numerous Federalist judges, including William Marbury, as a Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia. These appointments, known as “midnight judges,” were confirmed by the Senate, but their commissions needed to be delivered by the Secretary of State.
Jefferson’s Refusal and Marbury’s Lawsuit
When Jefferson took office, James Madison, his Secretary of State, refused to deliver several of the commissions, including Marbury’s. Marbury then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus, an order compelling Madison to deliver his commission. He based his claim on the Judiciary Act of 1789, which granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in such cases.
The Landmark Decision
Chief Justice John Marshall faced a difficult situation. Ordering Madison to deliver the commission would likely be ignored, weakening the Court. Refusing to issue the writ could be seen as caving to the executive branch. Marshall masterfully navigated this dilemma. He ruled that while Marbury was entitled to his commission, the section of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in this type of case was unconstitutional. By declaring a law passed by Congress unconstitutional, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
Significance of Judicial Review
The establishment of judicial review had a profound impact on the American legal system. It gave the Supreme Court the power to interpret the Constitution and ensure that laws passed by Congress and actions taken by the Executive branch are in accordance with it. This power has been used countless times to shape American law and society, from civil rights to economic regulations. Without Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court would have far less power and influence.
FAQs about Marbury v. Madison
What was the main issue in Marbury v. Madison?
The main issue was whether the Supreme Court had the authority to order the Secretary of State to deliver William Marbury’s judicial commission.
Why did Jefferson not want to deliver Marbury’s commission?
Jefferson opposed the “midnight judge” appointments made by his predecessor, John Adams, and likely wanted to appoint his own judges.
What is judicial review?
Judicial review is the power of the Supreme Court to declare laws unconstitutional, as established in Marbury v. Madison.
Why is Marbury v. Madison considered so important?
It established the principle of judicial review, giving the Supreme Court the power to interpret the Constitution and invalidate laws that conflict with it.
What part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was declared unconstitutional?
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which expanded the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction to include cases like Marbury’s, was declared unconstitutional.
Summary
Marbury v. Madison was a pivotal Supreme Court case that shaped the role of the judiciary in American government. By establishing judicial review, the Court gained the power to interpret the Constitution and ensure the constitutionality of laws, solidifying its place as a co-equal branch of government. This decision continues to have a significant impact on the balance of power and the development of American law.
Leave a Reply